PrintFriendly
Hon’ble National President of the Bharatiya Janata Party Shri Nitin Nabin addressed the media today in Patna (Bihar), and launched a strong attack on Congress’s “compromised” politics. It was stated that during its decades in power, the Gandhi–Nehru family repeatedly compromised national interest to prioritize personal and political gains. From Pt. Nehru to Rahul Gandhi, Congress’s dynastic politics has not merely been about power, but has evolved into a continuous pattern marked by foreign influence, corruption, and compromises with national interest.
Shri Nabin stated that it is essential to place before the nation the full ‘compromised story’ of the Congress, how, while compromising with the people of India, the Gandhi family’s ‘compromised mission’ continued, and how the Gandhi–Nehru family functioned primarily to safeguard its own private interests. At one point Jawaharlal Nehru reportedly remarked that 45 crore people were a liability. Such a statement, coming from a Prime Minister, was described as a grave betrayal of the nation’s citizens. The nature of relations maintained with foreign powers during that period is known to the entire country. The same pattern continues today, that while Rahul Gandhi claims to be ‘Babbar Sher’, the country has witnessed how he is a puppet in the hands of foreign power, reflecting a continuation of that compromised legacy.
Hon’ble BJP National President remarked that several major examples of the Congress family’s ‘compromised mission’ are recorded in history. It was asserted that history bears witness to how the secretariat of Pt. Jawaharlal Nehru functioned in a manner that appeared accessible to foreign agencies such as the CIA. In 1954, Pt. Nehru handed over India’s rights in Tibet to China without securing any reciprocal benefit. Under the cover of the Panchsheel Agreement, China’s occupation of Aksai Chin was effectively accepted. The country has also seen how Nehru advocated for granting permanent membership in the United Nations Security Council to China. Similarly, during the tenure of Indira Gandhi, former U.S. Ambassador Daniel Patrick Moynihan reportedly acknowledged that the CIA had provided funds to Congress for election campaigning. In the Simla Agreement, 93,000 Pakistani soldiers were released without securing Pakistan-occupied Kashmir, under which ‘compromised mission’ was this decision taken? Likewise, the decision to hand over the island of Katchatheevu to Sri Lanka was described as another reflection of Indira Gandhi’s ‘compromised mission.’
Shri Nitin Nabin highlighted that it is equally important to examine what was described as Rajiv Gandhi’s ‘compromised mission.’ Defence deals were turned into a means of filling private bank accounts. In the Bofors scandal, attempts were made to influence the Swedish investigation and to shield associate Ottavio Quattrocchi. Similarly, after the Bhopal Gas Tragedy, facilitating the safe departure of Warren Anderson from India in a government aircraft was another reflection of Congress’s ‘compromised mission.’ It was further stated that between 2004 and 2014, Sonia Gandhi functioned as a “Super PM” through the National Advisory Council, running a parallel authority over the government and cabinet to fulfill the mission of a ‘compromised PM.’ During the same period, the Rajiv Gandhi Foundation reportedly received funding from the Chinese government and networks linked to George Soros. The Congress was asked to clarify under which ‘compromised mission’ such funding was accepted and what kind of understanding, if any, was reached with the Chinese Communist Party. These incidents collectively present a glimpse of what has been described as the Congress party’s ‘compromised mission.’
Hon’ble BJP National President mentioned that Rahul Gandhi, described as the ‘poster boy’ of negative politics, has undertaken more than 247 foreign visits, yet details of many of these trips were not shared with security agencies. It was questioned under which ‘compromised mission’ this was taking place. Rahul Gandhi’s meetings abroad with individuals such as Ilhan Omar and George Soros, who have taken positions perceived as critical of India, and subsequently pursuing domestic politics aligned with their signals, were also questioned as part of this mission. Visiting the sensitive border region of Ladakh in the company of a foreign national such as Shakir Merali, who has links with Soros-backed capital networks, was cited as further evidence that Rahul Gandhi’s political trajectory advances a compromised legacy, with Rahul Gandhi emerging as its final messenger. The manner in which Rahul Gandhi continues to promote an anarchic political mindset reflects a compromised attitude, first compromising with national interest, then with political direction, and now, under this compromised mission, Sonia Gandhi, Rahul Gandhi, and the Congress party are attempting to divert the positive thinking of the youth. It was asserted that the people of India have understood this ‘compromised mission’ and recognize that any level of compromise with national interest is possible under it. In the coming times, the people of the country will deliver a firm response to those pursuing such a mission.